AvaTrade vs HF Markets (2025) – Full Broker Comparison

Comparison Summary: AvaTrade vs HF Markets

Here’s how both brokers typically compare across the main FX Trust Score categories:

Regulation

AvaTrade and HF Markets are both regulated across multiple regions, but AvaTrade has the stronger regulatory footprint in our scoring. It holds licences in Europe, Australia, South Africa, Japan, the Middle East and more, demonstrating a long-standing commitment to operating under strict oversight.

HF Markets is also well regulated, particularly in Africa and other emerging markets, but AvaTrade’s regulatory mix is more diversified and scores higher.

Security & Fund Protection

Security and fund protection are robust at both brokers, with segregated client accounts and standard controls. AvaTrade scores higher in our Index, thanks to its combination of regulatory coverage, operational standards and risk controls.

HF Markets remains safe in our model, but does not match AvaTrade’s overall security score.

Trading Conditions

AvaTrade offers a well-rounded trading environment with competitive spreads, multiple platforms (including MT4, MT5 and its own proprietary platforms) and a wide range of instruments.

HF Markets provides flexible accounts and decent pricing, particularly in certain regions, but its overall trading-conditions score is lower than AvaTrade’s in our dataset.

For traders who value a balanced mix of spreads, execution, instruments and platforms, AvaTrade holds the advantage.

Customer Support

In customer support, HF Markets performs slightly better, particularly in regions where it has strong local presence and tailored client service. Traders often appreciate its accessible, regionally-aware support.

AvaTrade also provides solid support with multiple channels, but HF Markets can feel more approachable in some markets. This gives HF Markets a narrow win in this pillar.

Online Reputation

AvaTrade has a stronger overall online reputation in our scoring. It has been active for many years, has a large client base and generally stable feedback across review sites and trader communities.

HF Markets enjoys positive sentiment too, but feedback can be more variable across regions, and its overall trust profile is slightly weaker than AvaTrade’s.

Overall Winner: AvaTrade

Based on the FX Trust Score Index, AvaTrade outperforms HF Markets overall. AvaTrade scores higher for regulation, security, trading conditions and online reputation, while customer support is competitive at both brokers.

HF Markets remains a solid option, particularly in regions where it has a strong local presence, but AvaTrade offers a more comprehensive and balanced proposition overall.

Comparison: Winners Summary

Regulation

• Winner: AvaTrade
  Broader and more diverse regulatory coverage across multiple continents.

Security & Fund Protection

• Winner: AvaTrade
  Higher security score reflecting strong segregation, controls and oversight.

Trading Conditions

• Winner: AvaTrade
  More balanced pricing and trading environment across forex and CFDs.

Customer Support

• Winner: HF Markets (Narrow)
  Slightly stronger local and regional support presence in some markets.

Online Reputation

• Winner: AvaTrade
  More stable long-term sentiment and stronger overall trust profile.

Conclusion: Which Broker is Better Overall?

If you’re comparing AvaTrade and HF Markets, your priorities will determine the best fit:

• If you want a well-balanced, globally regulated broker with strong security, multiple platforms, competitive conditions and a broadly positive reputation, AvaTrade is the better all-round choice.
• If you prioritise localised support and regional focus, particularly in markets where HF Markets has a strong presence, then HF Markets is worth considering.

From a pure FX Trust Score perspective, AvaTrade is the clear overall winner, but both brokers can be suitable depending on your location and preferences.